And all my captures are taken with Hypersnap, which was referred to me by a classmate. I use these tools for there simplicity of their interfaces.
1st Site URL http://www.dodge.com/en/2008/charger/
Author N/A
Institution (company) Dodge
2nd Site URL http://www.chargerforums.com/
Author N/A
Institution N/A
3rd Site URL http://www.edmunds.com/dodge/charger/review.html
Author N/A
Institution N/A (Edmunds)
Evaluating the Web
For this evaluation, i had a rather simplistic source to deal with. In hindsight i would have searched on something a bit deeper than cars. I now feel like Shallow Hal.
But none the less. These sites can still be reviewed! But for this example i will refer to a site used in my Assignment.
Netiquette Guidelines, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt
The reliability of this site is probably one of the most credible examples i used.
The author a distinguished engineer, wrote this document as a guidelines document. And has been adopted by many as just that.
Though somewhat dated, the information pertains to effective dialog decorum across communication channels on the net. EG- E-mail, forums, etc.
The main purpose of this site is to educate, and help establish a basic set of best practice rules in the workplace and home for communicating online. It goes into a thorough breakdown of the different communication semantics.
Record your reflections in your learning log.
From typing a annotation versus taking a snapshot, i would have to say for future academic references, annotating would have to be the best form of condensing information. By this i mean, effective annotation really helps you, and others, find what sites are really helpful on a subject matter.
I dont think a screen shot is anywhere near effective. Probably fine for recreational matter, but not for academic purposes.
No comments:
Post a Comment